« On veut voir les fesses de Sartre ! »

« On veut voir les fesses de Sartre ! »

To the intellectuel engagé, media can be a tool for the diffusion of one’s ideas. What then, when an image is published and diffused posthumously?

Spying into his unlocked bathroom in 1952, a 30-year-old Art Shay rapidly snaps shots of a nude Simone de Beauvoir (fig 1), who has just left the bath and is now fixing her hair in the mirror. “Vous êtes un villain garçon!” (You are a naughty boy!), she remarks upon hearing the snap of the Leica shutters- although she doesn’t tell him to stop, and the door remains open.

Simone de Beauvoir by Art Shay

Fig.1: Simone de Beauvoir by Art Shay

For years, Art Shay had thought these rolls of film to be lost, and even once they had been found, they were never published or exhibited while Beauvoir was still alive (Shay, 2008). Fast forward 56 years, and we find the photo retouched and centre stage on the cover of Le Nouvel Observateur, accompanied by the heading ‘Simone de Beauvoir La Scandaleuse’ (The Scandalous Simone de Beauvoir)(Fig 2).

Simone La Scandaleuse, Le Nouvel Observateur

Fig.2: Simone La Scandaleuse, Le Nouvel Observateur

Le Nouvel Observateur (L’OBS) is a widely-read weekly magazine in France, and one which had even been favoured by Beauvoir as a vehicle to disseminate her own philosophical theories- this was the paper which, to a massive audience, published the ‘Manifeste des 343’- a list of 343 women in 1971, courageously admitting to having had an abortion, at a time when it was illegal to do so in France (Centre Audiovisuel Simone de Beauvoir, 2004). The text was written by Beauvoir and was instrumental in the adoption of La Loi Veil in 1975 (Sinard, 2017). Here, L’OBS acted as an enabling platform for the female voice during the propagation of second-wave feminism- which makes the decision to use Art Shay’s photo accompanied by such a title seem all the more incongruous when we return our attention to this 2008 cover; understandably, it divided opinion.

TOO MUCH?

Unsurprisingly, it is easier to find evidence that the cover was poorly received, instead of appreciated when it hit the newsstands; the feminist protest group Les Chiennes de garde (the Guard Bitches) gathered outside the head office of the newspaper, brandishing placards reading « On veut voir les fesses de Marcel Ponty! » (We want to see Marcel Ponty’s arse!) and the names of other notable male philosophers (Rémy, 2014). The backlash was such that L’OBS filmed a debate between Agathe Logeart, of the L’OBS design team, and Danièle Sallenave, author of ‘Castor de Guerre’ to discuss this equivocal choice of front cover (Beauvoir: la polémique sous le regard de Sallenave, 2009).

« Cette femme qui sait qu’elle est vue, qui voit qu’on la voit, c’est une autre façon qu’elle a de se raconter » (This woman, who knows that she is seen, who sees that we see her… it’s another way in which she can show herself off) (Beauvoir: la polémique sous le regard de Sallenave, 2009)

What is clear from this debate, is that it is not the image which triggered outcry, but the fact that it was chosen for the cover: The photo had previously been exhibited without generating the same polemic. But here, even amongst critics, it is difficult to argue that the photo wasn’t deliberately used simply to cause a stir and to boost sales; consent of women is treated differently to that of men, and the female body has been used for years as a commodity to sell things (Beauvoir: la polémique sous le regard de Sallenave, 2009). The way this L’OBS cover was received clearly demonstrates peoples’ discomfort at this fact- after all, how many photos do we have of Sartre secretly snapped in the nude?

Les Chiennes de garde outside L’OBS head office- Jean Mulatier for Getty Images

To Sallenave, the use of the word ‘scandaleuse’ was an equivocal choice, because of course, Beauvoir is not scandalous here in her act of being photographed. The scandal which has at times surrounded her stems from her voice and her philosophy, especially when ‘Le Deuxième Sexe’ was first published. ‘Le Deuxième Sexe’ confronted readers with a depiction of female corporeality (namely the ‘passive’ nature of female genitalia) which at the time was absolutely shocking in its detail, and therefore forced a sort of public examination of opinion “on the scale of the problem of discrimination” (Tiukalo, 2012). With this retouched version of the photo however- light adjusted, her behind made to appear more rounded, and the caption that accompanies it- we are encouraged to think « Enfin ! Un journal qui va relever le scandale de la vie Beauvoir ! » (Finally! A paper that reveals the scandal of Beauvoir’s life!)(Beauvoir: la polémique sous le regard de Sallenave, 2009): It fails to correspond appropriately to the accompanying article, which is subsequently cheapened by the ambiguity of the cover page.

SO, WHAT’S IT TO BEAUVOIR?

If she were still alive today, to speculate on what Beauvoir would have thought of the L’OBS cover and the storm which briefly surrounded it really does depend on which ‘Beauvoir’ you choose to look at: The issue of sexism reads differently according to different points in her life and the publication of numerous letters after her death has caused academics to rethink an intellectual they previously thought to have a good grasp of (Kirkpatrick, 2019). Since her death, occasional contradictions between her ideologies and her actions have become more apparent, and she inconsistently recognised these discrepancies within herself, which raises the question “are we the sum of all our actions, or the sum of our worst?”. In 1949, just before Art Shay conducted the impromptu Chicago séance, Beauvoir was interpreted by critics as being anti-woman, and yet Agathe Logeart justified the choice of Shay’s image on the cover of L’OBS by the supposition that when we talk of Simone de Beauvoir, we are talking about a « femme très femme » (a very female woman) (Beauvoir: la polémique sous le regard de Sallenave, 2009)- maybe it is more a question of what parts of this illustrious female intellectual one wishes to prescribe to.

When L’OBS published their magazine with this controversial cover, certain feminists staggered backwards- it’s true that the same photo would not have been chosen, if it existed, for a cover featuring Sartre. But would Simone de Beauvoir necessarily have cared? She has written extensively on the female body and its purpose, and, recognising the importance of capitalising on the different media forms which now existed as vehicles for the dissemination of her ideas, she surely recognised that in using the media to get your voice heard, you are also resigning yourself to the fact that your image may be manipulated or presented in a way that is

not to your choosing. Beauvoir used real biological data to demonstrate men’s superiority to women, suggesting that biology and not simply societal factors alone are at play when we search for a reason for the subordination of women to men; the female fate is inescapable, and the “passivity of the female body is not only a product of society” (Tiukalo, 2012) but of biology, too. At the same time, she saw “the body as both a transcendent subject for me and an immanent object for others” (Cataldi, 2001); while recognising that her body could be reduced to something which triggers a conflict of desires between herself and others, she also challenged social convention and understanding of intimacy. She wanted to be free to appreciate and uphold the value of intimacy, while simultaneously ridding herself of the historical shackles of “domesticating meanings of exclusivity” (Hengehold, 2002).

We may suppose, then, that it is slightly academic to even consider the potential of Simone de Beauvoir’s opinion here; she had no objections to Art Shay taking her photo- she had such a habit of showering with the door open that Shay had even been warned about the fact before he met her (Shay, 2008), and for all we know, the controversial headline may have amused her- it certainly hasn’t slowed down the consumption of her written work! Opinion being for or against, we can be certain that she would have had one. If she were to have objected to Le Nouvel Observateur’s front cover choice, we would have of course been able to read what she had to say on the matter via some media form or another; of that, we can be sure.

 

 

APPENDIX:

Fig.1:

Source: Morrison Hotel Gallery, ‘Simone de Beauvoir, 1950’ (Chicago, 1950), Photo by Art Shay

https://www.morrisonhotelgallery.com/photographs/RN31Is/Simone-de-Beauvoir-1950

Fig.2:
Source : BIBLIOBS, Re-published November 5 2017, Cover design directed by Agathe Logeart,

‘Simone de Beauvoir, La Scandaleuse’, Le Nouvel Observateur, 2008

https://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/idees/20160413.OBS8441/simone-de-beauvoir-la- scandaleuse.html

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

‘Beauvoir: La Polémique Sous Le Regard de Sallenave’, 2009 <https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbj60i&gt; [accessed 9 November 2019]

Cataldi, S. L., ‘The Body as a Basis for Being: Simone de Beauvoir and Maurice Merleau-Ponty’, in The Existential Phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir (Springer, 2001), pp. 85–106

Centre Audiovisuel Simone de Beauvoir, 30 Ans Après La Loi Veil; Regards Croisés Sur La Contraception et l’IVG, 2004

Hengehold, L., ‘“Anonymity Would Have Suited Me Perfectly”: Simone de Beauvoir on Writing as a Practice of Intimacy’, The Philosophical Forum, XXXIII.2 (2002), 195–211

Kirkpatrick, K., ‘Was Simone de Beauvoir as Feminist as We Thought?’, The Guardian, 2019

Mulatier, J., ‘Manifestation Des Chiennes de Garde Au Nouvel Observateur.’, 2008 <https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/manifestation-des-chiennes-de- garde-au-nouvel-observateur-news-photo/967196742> [accessed 11 November 2019].

Rémy, J., Le Nouvel Observateur: 50 Ans de Passion (Paris: Pygmalion, 2014)

Shay, A., ‘Photo de Simone de Beauvoir : Art Shay Raconte’, Le Nouvel Observateur, 2008

Sinard, A., ‘Avant La Loi Veil, Le Coup d’éclat Des 343 “Salopes”’, France Culture, 2017

Tiukalo, A., ‘The Notion of the Body and Sex in Simone de Beauvoir’s Philosophy’, Human Movement, 13 (2012), 78–85

 

FURTHER READING:

Coffin, J. G., ‘Sex, Love, and Letters: Writing Simone de Beauvoir, 1949—1963’, The American Historical Review, 115.4 (2010), 1061–88.

Galster, I., ‘“The Limit of the Abject”. Receptions of Le Deuxième Sexe in 1949’, in A Companion to Simone de Beauvoir, 2017, pp. 37–46.

Guilbeault, L., American Feminism (Beauvoir et Les Québécoises)- Rushes.
Klaw, B., ‘Update on Simone de Beauvoir’, Women in French Studies, 9 (2001), 253–68.

Manon, P. (Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour), ‘La Transmission Autobiographique de Simone de Beauvoir : Une Écriture Du Féminin Entre Singulier et Universel.’, 2016.

McHugh, J., ‘How 343 Women Made French History by Talking About Their Abortions’, TIME, 2018.

Popova, M., ‘A Breakup Letter from Simone de Beauvoir’, Brain Pickings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s